Thanks Dan! On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Pushkar Jambhlekar > <pushkar....@gmail.com> wrote: >> dax_dev_huge_fault returning without releasing lock. Making code change to >> avoid this situation >> >> Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar <pushkar....@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/dax/dax.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/dax.c b/drivers/dax/dax.c >> index 0d1ca24..fd9c4db 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dax/dax.c >> +++ b/drivers/dax/dax.c >> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int dax_dev_huge_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, >> rc = __dax_dev_pud_fault(dax_dev, vmf); >> break; >> default: >> - return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK; >> + rc = VM_FAULT_FALLBACK; >> } >> rcu_read_unlock(); > > Thanks Pushkar, I'll apply this and combine with patch 2 as well.
-- Jambhlekar Pushkar Arun
