On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check > >running at? > Around 44MB/s. > > I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other > processes to 'stay alive'? > > echo "Setting minimum resync speed to 200MB/s..." > echo "This improves the resync speed from 2.1MB/s to 44MB/s" > echo 200000 > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_speed_min > echo 200000 > /sys/block/md1/md/sync_speed_min > echo 200000 > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_speed_min > echo 200000 > /sys/block/md3/md/sync_speed_min > echo 200000 > /sys/block/md4/md/sync_speed_min
md RAID1 resync reacts *extremely* badly to CFQ. Just a data point, you may want to check on it. Might mean other RAID types also get screwed, and also that md "check" is also disturbed by CFQ (or disturbs CFQ, whatever). I reverted everything here to non-CFQ while the RAID did its resync (which fixed all issues immediately), and we went back to 2.6.16.x later for other reasons. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
