3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>


[ Upstream commit 9a0b1e8ba4061778897b544afc898de2163382f7 ]

After Jesper commit back in linux-3.18, we trigger a lockdep
splat in proc_create_data() while allocating memory from
pktgen_change_name().

This patch converts t->if_lock to a mutex, since it is now only
used from control path, and adds proper locking to pktgen_change_name()

1) pktgen_thread_lock to protect the outer loop (iterating threads)
2) t->if_lock to protect the inner loop (iterating devices)

Note that before Jesper patch, pktgen_change_name() was lacking proper
protection, but lockdep was not able to detect the problem.

Fixes: 8788370a1d4b ("pktgen: RCU-ify "if_list" to remove lock in 
next_to_run()")
Reported-by: John Sperbeck <jsperb...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/pktgen.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@
 #define T_REMDEV      (1<<3)   /* Remove one dev */
 
 /* If lock -- protects updating of if_list */
-#define   if_lock(t)           spin_lock(&(t->if_lock));
-#define   if_unlock(t)           spin_unlock(&(t->if_lock));
+#define   if_lock(t)           mutex_lock(&(t->if_lock));
+#define   if_unlock(t)           mutex_unlock(&(t->if_lock));
 
 /* Used to help with determining the pkts on receive */
 #define PKTGEN_MAGIC 0xbe9be955
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ struct pktgen_net {
 };
 
 struct pktgen_thread {
-       spinlock_t if_lock;             /* for list of devices */
+       struct mutex if_lock;           /* for list of devices */
        struct list_head if_list;       /* All device here */
        struct list_head th_list;
        struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -1952,11 +1952,13 @@ static void pktgen_change_name(const str
 {
        struct pktgen_thread *t;
 
+       mutex_lock(&pktgen_thread_lock);
+
        list_for_each_entry(t, &pn->pktgen_threads, th_list) {
                struct pktgen_dev *pkt_dev;
 
-               rcu_read_lock();
-               list_for_each_entry_rcu(pkt_dev, &t->if_list, list) {
+               if_lock(t);
+               list_for_each_entry(pkt_dev, &t->if_list, list) {
                        if (pkt_dev->odev != dev)
                                continue;
 
@@ -1971,8 +1973,9 @@ static void pktgen_change_name(const str
                                       dev->name);
                        break;
                }
-               rcu_read_unlock();
+               if_unlock(t);
        }
+       mutex_unlock(&pktgen_thread_lock);
 }
 
 static int pktgen_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
@@ -3656,7 +3659,7 @@ static int __net_init pktgen_create_thre
                return -ENOMEM;
        }
 
-       spin_lock_init(&t->if_lock);
+       mutex_init(&t->if_lock);
        t->cpu = cpu;
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&t->if_list);


Reply via email to