Re-to: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org On 04/17/2017 10:56 AM, Cao jin wrote: > Remove superfluous word; unify comments and function prototype. > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c > index 51860bf..ba5fcbe 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ void acpi_tb_create_local_fadt(struct acpi_table_header > *table, u32 length) > * The 64-bit X fields are optional extensions to the original 32-bit FADT > * V1.0 fields. Even if they are present in the FADT, they are optional and > * are unused if the BIOS sets them to zero. Therefore, we must copy/expand > - * 32-bit V1.0 fields to the 64-bit X fields if the the 64-bit X field is > + * 32-bit V1.0 fields to the 64-bit X fields if the 64-bit X field is > * originally zero. > * > * For ACPI 1.0 FADTs (that contain no 64-bit addresses), all 32-bit address > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > index 5a968a7..e05555c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void acpi_tb_check_dsdt_header(void) > * > * FUNCTION: acpi_tb_copy_dsdt > * > - * PARAMETERS: table_desc - Installed table to copy > + * PARAMETERS: table_index - Index of installed table to copy > * > * RETURN: None > * > @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ acpi_tb_get_root_table_entry(u8 *table_entry, u32 > table_entry_size) > * > * FUNCTION: acpi_tb_parse_root_table > * > - * PARAMETERS: rsdp - Pointer to the RSDP > + * PARAMETERS: rsdp_address - Pointer to the RSDP > * > * RETURN: Status > * >
-- Sincerely, Cao jin
