On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:36:35PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Please clean it up properly with two structs.
>
> Not sure about this, now I've done it. Running it here.
>
> If you like it, I can do x86-64 as well.
>
> ==
> lguest defines its own TSS struct because the "struct tss_struct"
> contains linux-specific additions. Andi asked me to split the struct
> in processor.h.
>
> Unfortunately it makes usage a little awkward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -r 7edfac26a523 include/asm-i386/processor.h
> --- a/include/asm-i386/processor.h Thu Mar 29 20:02:17 2007 +1000
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/processor.h Fri Mar 30 12:22:38 2007 +1000
> @@ -325,7 +325,8 @@ typedef struct {
>
> struct thread_struct;
>
> -struct tss_struct {
> +/* This is the TSS defined by the hardware. */
> +struct i386_hw_tss {
> unsigned short back_link,__blh;
> unsigned long esp0;
> unsigned short ss0,__ss0h;
> @@ -349,6 +350,11 @@ struct tss_struct {
> unsigned short gs, __gsh;
> unsigned short ldt, __ldth;
> unsigned short trace, io_bitmap_base;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct tss_struct {
> + struct i386_hw_tss x86_tss;
> +
> /*
> * The extra 1 is there because the CPU will access an
> * additional byte beyond the end of the IO permission
This comment needs to stay in the first struct..?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
