The frequency table shouldn't have any zero frequency entries and so
such a check isn't required. Though it would be better to make sure
'state' is within limits.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index c85b217d16c8..dc73405b04f2 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
@@ -560,12 +560,13 @@ static int cpufreq_state2power(struct 
thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
        int ret;
        struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
 
+       /* Request state should be less than max_level */
+       if (WARN_ON(state > cpufreq_cdev->max_level))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        num_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpus);
 
        freq = cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[state].frequency;
-       if (!freq)
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        dynamic_power = cpu_freq_to_power(cpufreq_cdev, freq) * num_cpus;
        ret = get_static_power(cpufreq_cdev, tz, freq, &static_power);
        if (ret)
-- 
2.12.0.432.g71c3a4f4ba37

Reply via email to