On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:05 +0000, Xenofon Antidides wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andrew Morton <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>; Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM > Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL > > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm cautiously optimistic that we're at the thin edge of the bugfix > > > wedge now. > [...] > > > and the numbers he posted: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117448900626028&w=2 > > We been staring at these numbers for while now and we come to the conclusion > they wrong. > > The test is f is 3 tasks, two on different and one on same cpu as sh here: > virgin 2.6.21-rc3-rsdl-smp > top - 13:52:50 up 7 min, 12 users, load average: 3.45, 2.89, 1.51 > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ P COMMAND > 6560 root 31 0 2892 1236 1032 R 82 0.1 1:50.24 1 sh > 6558 root 28 0 1428 276 228 S 42 0.0 1:00.09 1 f > 6557 root 30 0 1424 280 228 R 35 0.0 1:00.25 0 f > 6559 root 39 0 1424 276 228 R 33 0.0 0:58.36 0 f
This is a 1 second sample, tasks migrate. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/