On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:49:56 -0700 > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Did we end up deciding whether this is (needed*safe) enough for 2.6.21? > > > > I say no for now, I have seen no bug reports for any hardware that is > > not in a lab for this. > > Well. Presumably that hardware will be in the field during the lifetime of > 2.6.21-based kernels. > > Perhaps we should put this into 2.6.22 then backport it to 2.6.21.x once it > seems safe to do so. If we decide to go this way, we'll need to ask Mitch > to remind us to do the backport at the appropriate time, else we'll surely > forget.
Yes, that's what I just asked him to do a message ago :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
