Hello Wolfram,
On 04/19/2017 02:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The example contains a device node for a retu device, but
>> its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix.
>>
>> While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if we fix the driver also so it actually matches the
> below compatible? I can't find such a change in linux-next.
>
[snip]
>>
>> - retu-mfd: retu@1 {
>> - compatible = "retu-mfd";
>> + retu: retu@1 {
>> + compatible = "nokia,retu";
>> reg = <0x1>;
>> };
You mean having a "nokia,retu" entry in a OF table?
That's done by patch 3/8 in this series:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg173145.html
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
