Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I think that's wrong: whereas the binfmt_elf one did its > page_cache_release down below at the bottom of the block, this > version does it in each subblock,
All but the first, which is why there's not a common one post if-complex. > so there you're removing the dump_seek success one. Can't we preserve that > beauteous macro here and just do... > ... > - DUMP_SEEK(file->f_pos + PAGE_SIZE); > page_cache_release(page); > + DUMP_SEEK(file->f_pos + PAGE_SIZE); Actually, that works just as well, I think. I like it better than my suggestion (see email in response to Andrew). David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
