On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:44:58 +0200 Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > here's more... > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > 00000000 > printing eip: > 00000000 > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0000 [#1] > Modules linked in: binfmt_misc sit nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc ipt_ECN > iptable_mangle w83627ehf i2c_isa i2c_viapro i2c_core via_agp agpgart rtc > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] Not tainted VLI > EFLAGS: 00010016 (2.6.20.3-cks1 #4) That's not 2.6.20.4. > EIP is at 0x0 > eax: e94a5e6c ebx: e94a5e6c ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000001 > esi: 00000000 edi: e94a5e84 ebp: e94a5e6c esp: e94a5e4c > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 > Process grep (pid: 9156, ti=e94a4000 task=f4569a90 task.ti=e94a4000) > Stack: c0116429 00000000 00000001 00000001 ec7da800 00000000 00000286 > 00000000 > e94a5e84 c0117802 00000000 00000000 ec7da800 ec7da800 ec7da85c > c015c622 > 00000000 e9d02b40 e94a5f60 f77b6ac0 00000000 00000400 c0313e6c > 00001000 > Call Trace: > [<c0116429>] __wake_up_common+0x39/0x70 > [<c0117802>] __wake_up+0x22/0x30 > [<c015c622>] pipe_write+0x222/0x4b0 > [<c0156887>] do_sync_write+0xc7/0x110 > [<c012b5c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 > [<c0157156>] vfs_write+0xa6/0x160 > [<c01567c0>] do_sync_write+0x0/0x110 > [<c0157781>] sys_write+0x41/0x70 > [<c0102ed6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x85 > [<c0300033>] ipv6_flowlabel_opt+0x193/0x730 > ======================= > Code: Bad EIP value. > EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:e94a5e4c __wake_up() did a jump-to-zero. Is it repeatable? Does removal of Con's patchset fix it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/