On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Yes, I think this is a flase positive - we'll never touch initkmem_list3[] > > after free_initmem() because of the transitions of g_cpucache_up. > > Correct. > > > (In which case set_up_list3s() shoud be __init, too?) > > Correct. Its only called during slab bootstrap. > > > Christoph, I think you looked at this previously? > > If you change set_up_list3s to __init then we have the same issue with > setup_cpu_cache right? yup. I wonder if there's a general way in which we can suppress such false positives. Say, create a new section called, umm, __nowarn and __nowarndata and then we can tag functions or data with those tags tag and teach the checker tools to ignore them? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
