4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>

commit 32fe905c17f001c0eee13c59afddd0bf2eed509c upstream.

It is perfectly fine to link a tmpfile back using linkat().
Since tmpfiles are created with a link count of 0 they appear
on the orphan list, upon re-linking the inode has to be removed
from the orphan list again.

Ralph faced a filesystem corruption in combination with overlayfs
due to this bug.

Cc: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com>
Fixes: 474b93704f321 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ubifs/dir.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -622,6 +622,11 @@ static int ubifs_link(struct dentry *old
                return err;
 
        lock_2_inodes(dir, inode);
+
+       /* Handle O_TMPFILE corner case, it is allowed to link a O_TMPFILE. */
+       if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+               ubifs_delete_orphan(c, inode->i_ino);
+
        inc_nlink(inode);
        ihold(inode);
        inode->i_ctime = ubifs_current_time(inode);
@@ -641,6 +646,8 @@ out_cancel:
        dir->i_size -= sz_change;
        dir_ui->ui_size = dir->i_size;
        drop_nlink(inode);
+       if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
+               ubifs_add_orphan(c, inode->i_ino);
        unlock_2_inodes(dir, inode);
        ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
        iput(inode);


Reply via email to