On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:45:12AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 07:25:42PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > I fixed it this way:
> 
> fix is plain wrong, it's still possible to have lseek return -1 -2 -3 -4
> even when it should return -EINVAL.
> 

Try this again 2.2.18pre21. It works for me.


-- 
H.J. Lu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---
--- linux/fs/ext2/file.c.lseek  Sat Nov 18 17:18:49 2000
+++ linux/fs/ext2/file.c        Sat Nov 18 17:19:28 2000
@@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ static long long ext2_file_lseek(
                case 1:
                        offset += file->f_pos;
        }
+       if (offset < 0)
+               return -EINVAL;
        if (((unsigned long long) offset >> 32) != 0) {
 #if BITS_PER_LONG < 64
                return -EINVAL;
--- linux/fs/proc/mem.c.lseek   Tue Jan  4 10:12:23 2000
+++ linux/fs/proc/mem.c Sat Nov 18 17:19:28 2000
@@ -196,14 +196,17 @@ static long long mem_lseek(struct file *
 {
        switch (orig) {
                case 0:
-                       file->f_pos = offset;
-                       return file->f_pos;
+                       break;
                case 1:
-                       file->f_pos += offset;
-                       return file->f_pos;
+                       offset += file->f_pos;
+                       break;
                default:
                        return -EINVAL;
        }
+       if (offset < 0)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+       file->f_pos = offset;
+       return offset;
 }
 
 /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to