>Blame on the dual meaning of max_loop that it uses currently: to >initialize a set of loop devices and as a side effect, it also sets >the upper limit. People are complaining about the former constrain, >isn't it? Does anyone uses the 2nd meaning of upper limit? > >- Ken
what sense would it make to set an upper limit at all? we`re so happy to have none anymore :) i think andrew`s suggestion is just good: >So if we're worried about not breaking existing setups, we should retain >this module parameter as a do-nothing thing, maybe with a >this-is-going-away warning printk, too. roland _______________________________________________________________ SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
