On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:48:45AM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > +&ether {
> > > +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +       pinctrl-0 = <&ether_pins>;
> > > +
> > > +       status = "okay";
> > > +
> > > +       renesas,no-ether-link;
> > > +       phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> > > +       phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > > +               reg = <0>;
> > 
> > Shouldn't the interrupt (connected to P1_15) be described?
> 
> 
> That interrupt pin from the PHY is not used. It did not need to be connected.

So things are fine as above or should I expect to see v6?

Reply via email to