On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:37:06PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: >On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Wei Yang wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 05:26:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: >> >On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Wei Yang wrote: >> > >> >> According to current code path, numa_nodes_parsed is already setup when >> >> numa_emucation() is called. >> >> >> >> x86_numa_init() >> >> numa_init() >> >> init_func() >> >> >> >> numa_emulation() >> >> >> >> numa_register_memblks() >> >> >> > >> >s/numa_emucation/numa_emulation/, but I think everything above should just >> >be reworded to say the following since it establishes the dependency: >> > >> >numa_init() has already called init_func(), which is responsible for >> >setting numa_nodes_parsed, so use this nodemask instead of re-finding it >> >when calling numa_emulation(). >> > >> >> Yep, thanks. >> >> Looks your change log is better :-) >> > >Thanks! Would it be possible to refresh the series and repost for the x86 >maintainers?
Sure, I have sent out V2 with changes from your comments. Thanks~ -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
