On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:23 PM, SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 22:52:29 +0200 > > Some data were put into a sequence by five separate function calls. > Print the same data by a single function call instead.
> - seq_printf(s, "No config found for dev/state/pin, > expected:\n"); > - seq_printf(s, "Searched dev:%s\n", dbg->dev_name); > - seq_printf(s, "Searched state:%s\n", dbg->state_name); > - seq_printf(s, "Searched pin:%s\n", dbg->pin_name); > - seq_printf(s, "Use: modify config_pin <devname> "\ > - "<state> <pinname> <value>\n"); > + seq_printf(s, > + "No config found for dev/state/pin, expected:\n" > + "Searched dev:%s\n" > + "Searched state:%s\n" > + "Searched pin:%s\n" > + "Use: modify config_pin <devname> <state> > <pinname> <value>\n", > + dbg->dev_name, > + dbg->state_name, > + dbg->pin_name); Please, no. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
