On 03/05/2017 at 16:50:12 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > The rv4162 vendor is microcrystal, not ST.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-nitrogen6_max.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-nitrogen6_max.dtsi 
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-nitrogen6_max.dtsi
> > index bad3c9f9eeac..b63134e3b51a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-nitrogen6_max.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-nitrogen6_max.dtsi
> > @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
> >     };
> >  
> >     rtc: rtc@68 {
> > -           compatible = "st,rv4162";
> > +           compatible = "microcrystal,rv4162";
> 
> The compatible is not documented?
> 

No, it wasn't. Like for many i2c devices, the driver predates DT and
didn't need any specific code to be used from DT. Basically, the i2c
core was using the i2c_device_ids to match the DT compatible string.
This is changing since cabcf4f6be658b2d4bea26dee89d08fdf67d6811.

I'm planning to document all the undocumented ones soon.

> Shawn
> 
> >             pinctrl-names = "default";
> >             pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_rv4162>;
> >             reg = <0x68>;
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to