Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:48:33PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > The LTC3651 reports its status via GPIO lines. This driver translates > the GPIO levels to battery charger status information via sysfs. > It relies on devicetree to supply the IO configuration. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl> > --- > I'll send the devicetree binding documentation in a separate patch.
FYI: I will not merge the driver without the docs.
> drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 7 ++
> drivers/power/supply/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/power/supply/ltc3651-charger.c | 224
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 232 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/power/supply/ltc3651-charger.c
> [...]
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/ltc3651-charger.c
> b/drivers/power/supply/ltc3651-charger.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..cf73640
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/ltc3651-charger.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017, Topic Embedded Products
> + * Driver for LTC3651 charger IC.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
> + * with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> + * 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Can you drop the second paragraph? That way we do not need to update
their address every now and then.
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
Do you really need of_gpio.h?
> +struct ltc3651_charger {
> + struct power_supply *charger;
> + struct power_supply_desc charger_desc;
> + struct gpio_desc *acpr_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *fault_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *chrg_gpio;
> +};
[...]
> +static int ltc3651_charger_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> + enum power_supply_property psp, union power_supply_propval *val)
> +{
> + struct ltc3651_charger *ltc3651_charger = psy_to_ltc3651_charger(psy);
> +
> + switch (psp) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS:
> + if (!ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio) {
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (gpiod_get_value(ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio))
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
> + else
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING;
> + break;
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE:
> + val->intval = gpiod_get_value(ltc3651_charger->acpr_gpio);
> + break;
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH:
> + if (!ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio) {
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_HEALTH_UNKNOWN;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!gpiod_get_value(ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio)) {
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_HEALTH_GOOD;
> + break;
> + }
> + /*
> + * If the fault pin is active, the chrg pin explains the type
> + * of failure.
> + */
> + if (!ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio) {
> + val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_HEALTH_UNSPEC_FAILURE;
> + break;
> + }
> + val->intval = gpiod_get_value(ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio) ?
> + POWER_SUPPLY_HEALTH_OVERHEAT :
> + POWER_SUPPLY_HEALTH_DEAD;
> + break;
So reporting of status is incorrect with fault_gpio being set?
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static enum power_supply_property ltc3651_charger_properties[] = {
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH,
> +};
> +
> +static int ltc3651_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = {};
> + struct ltc3651_charger *ltc3651_charger;
> + struct power_supply_desc *charger_desc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ltc3651_charger = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ltc3651_charger),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ltc3651_charger) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to alloc driver structure\n");
Drop this. It won't happen on real systems and the memory allocation
will print warnings itself.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + ltc3651_charger->acpr_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev,
> + "acpr", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(ltc3651_charger->acpr_gpio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to acquire acpr GPIO: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev,
> + "fault", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to acquire fault GPIO: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev,
> + "chrg", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to acquire chrg GPIO: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + charger_desc = <c3651_charger->charger_desc;
> + charger_desc->name = pdev->dev.of_node->name;
> + charger_desc->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_MAINS;
> + charger_desc->properties = ltc3651_charger_properties;
> + charger_desc->num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(ltc3651_charger_properties);
> + charger_desc->get_property = ltc3651_charger_get_property;
> + psy_cfg.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + psy_cfg.drv_data = ltc3651_charger;
> +
> + ltc3651_charger->charger = power_supply_register(&pdev->dev,
> + charger_desc, &psy_cfg);
> + if (IS_ERR(ltc3651_charger->charger)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register power supply: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Acquire IRQs for the GPIO pins if possible */
> + if (ltc3651_charger->acpr_gpio) {
> + ret = gpiod_to_irq(ltc3651_charger->acpr_gpio);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + ret = devm_request_any_context_irq(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + ltc3651_charger_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request acpr irq\n");
> + }
> + if (ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio) {
> + ret = gpiod_to_irq(ltc3651_charger->fault_gpio);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + ret = devm_request_any_context_irq(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + ltc3651_charger_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request fault irq\n");
> + }
> + if (ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio) {
> + ret = gpiod_to_irq(ltc3651_charger->chrg_gpio);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + ret = devm_request_any_context_irq(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + ltc3651_charger_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ltc3651_charger->charger);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request chrg irq\n");
> + }
I think we should either require irq support or provide
some kind of polling fallback.
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ltc3651_charger);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ltc3651_charger_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct ltc3651_charger *ltc3651_charger = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + power_supply_unregister(ltc3651_charger->charger);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Use devm_power_supply_register() and kill remove function :)
> +static const struct of_device_id ltc3651_charger_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ltc3651-charger" },
Missing vendor prefix.
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc3651_charger_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ltc3651_charger_driver = {
> + .probe = ltc3651_charger_probe,
> + .remove = ltc3651_charger_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ltc3651-charger",
> + .of_match_table = ltc3651_charger_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(ltc3651_charger_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for LTC3651 charger");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:ltc3651-charger");
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
