On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 23:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm, well, six-of-one, VI of the other. We save maybe four kmallocs across > the entire uptime at the cost of exposing stuff kernel-side which doesn't > need to be exposed.
This is not about efficiency. When have I *ever* posted optimization patches? This is about clarity. We have a standard convention for register/unregister. And they can't fail. Either of these would be sufficient to justify a change. Too many people doing cool new things in the kernel, not enough polishing of the crap that's already there 8( > But I think we need to weed that crappiness out of XFS first. Sure, I'll apply on top of that patch. Thanks! Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
