On Mon, 8 May 2017 19:42:46 +0200 SF Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > Which issue do you mean? I dont see any issue you fix here. > > Are the run time characteristics a bit nicer for the function “seq_putc” > in comparison to the function “seq_puts” for printing a single line break > here? > > Regards, > Markus I would put this in why bother category. seq_puts is correct and this is only in diagnostic output useful to developer and disabled on most distro kernels
