Hello, On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:20:58PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > > Tejun, do I read your comments on the patch as an ACK? > > Tejun and I were wondering why we need this "create an array with the > indices" in the first place. If we can just call radix_tree_delete() > directly from the radix_tree_for_each_slot() loop, we can have a much > better fix (omitting the memory allocation at all)
Yeah, it doesn't make sense to allocate to destroy a radix tree. It'd be much better to cleanup the code so that it doesn't need allocation in the first place. Thanks. -- tejun
