The comment does not match the driver, which actually supports automatic assignment. Fix this by updating the comment.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> --- include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h b/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h index 4354beefd584..82d96a346e6f 100644 --- a/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h +++ b/include/linux/spi/mcp23s08.h @@ -7,11 +7,11 @@ struct mcp23s08_platform_data { */ u32 spi_present_mask; - /* "base" is the number of the first GPIO. Dynamic assignment is - * not currently supported, and even if there are gaps in chip - * addressing the GPIO numbers are sequential .. so for example - * if only slaves 0 and 3 are present, their GPIOs range from - * base to base+15 (or base+31 for s17 variant). + /* "base" is the number of the first GPIO or -1 for dynamic + * assignment. If there are gaps in chip addressing the GPIO + * numbers are sequential .. so for example if only slaves 0 + * and 3 are present, their GPIOs range from base to base+15 + * (or base+31 for s17 variant). */ unsigned base; }; -- 2.11.0
