On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:01:51PM -0700, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > In that case your patch does not suffice. Overlapping move _forwards_ still > > yields unexpected results, doesn't it? > > Why? memmove can move both ways. Do we need to change more memcpy's to > memmove's?
Because it's not going to be *one* call of memcpy() or memmove(). It's one per page.
