On 17/05/17 17:39, Chris Packham wrote:
> The mchp23lcv1024 is software compatible with the mchp23k256, the
> only difference (from a software point of view) is the size. There
> is no way to detect the size so we must be told via a Device Tree.


I've just noticed that another difference between the 2 chips is 16-bit 
vs 24-bit addressing. So that will also need to be handled.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
>   .../bindings/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.txt           |  2 +-
>   drivers/mtd/devices/mchp23k256.c                    | 21 
> +++++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.txt
> index 25e5ad38b0f0..7328eb92a03c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/microchip,mchp23k256.txt
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>   Required properties:
>   - #address-cells, #size-cells : Must be present if the device has sub-nodes
>     representing partitions.
> -- compatible : Must be "microchip,mchp23k256"
> +- compatible : Must be one of "microchip,mchp23k256" or 
> "microchip,mchp23lcv1024"
>   - reg : Chip-Select number
>   - spi-max-frequency : Maximum frequency of the SPI bus the chip can operate 
> at
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/mchp23k256.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/devices/mchp23k256.c
> index 02c6b9dcbd3e..d1eba587633c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/mchp23k256.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/mchp23k256.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>   #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>   
> +enum chips { mchp23k256, mchp23lcv1024 };
> +
>   struct mchp23k256_flash {
>       struct spi_device       *spi;
>       struct mutex            lock;
> @@ -128,6 +130,7 @@ static int mchp23k256_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>       struct mchp23k256_flash *flash;
>       struct flash_platform_data *data;
>       int err;
> +     enum chips chip;
>   
>       flash = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*flash), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!flash)
> @@ -143,15 +146,28 @@ static int mchp23k256_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>   
>       data = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);
>   
> +     if (spi->dev.of_node)
> +             chip = (enum chips)of_device_get_match_data(&spi->dev);
> +     else
> +             chip = mchp23k256;
> +
>       mtd_set_of_node(&flash->mtd, spi->dev.of_node);
>       flash->mtd.dev.parent   = &spi->dev;
>       flash->mtd.type         = MTD_RAM;
>       flash->mtd.flags        = MTD_CAP_RAM;
>       flash->mtd.writesize    = 1;
> -     flash->mtd.size         = SZ_32K;
>       flash->mtd._read        = mchp23k256_read;
>       flash->mtd._write       = mchp23k256_write;
>   
> +     switch (chip){
> +     case mchp23lcv1024:
> +             flash->mtd.size         = SZ_128K;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             flash->mtd.size         = SZ_32K;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +
>       flash->mtd.erasesize = PAGE_SIZE;
>       while (flash->mtd.size & (flash->mtd.erasesize - 1))
>               flash->mtd.erasesize >>= 1;
> @@ -172,7 +188,8 @@ static int mchp23k256_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>   }
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id mchp23k256_of_table[] = {
> -     { .compatible = "microchip,mchp23k256" },
> +     { .compatible = "microchip,mchp23k256", .data = (void *)mchp23k256 },
> +     { .compatible = "microchip,mchp23lcv1024", .data = (void 
> *)mchp23lcv1024 },
>       {}
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mchp23k256_of_table);
> 

Reply via email to