Hi, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2017 12:40:02 -0700 > Doug Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This appears to have been introduced in 2009 by commit afbab76a62b6 >> ("ring-buffer: have read page swap increment counter with page >> entries"), which removed the user of the function but not the function >> itself. If folks were so inclined, this could be picked back to >> linux-stable, but I'm not sure it's worth it. > > It doesn't do anything but waste some disk space in the source > repository. It's a static inline function, which means it's not created > unless something calls it. > > Thus, not worth the stable churn.
Yup, that's sane. I guess not much chance of someone trying to get clang to run w/ no warnings by just picking stable patches. ;-) -Doug
