On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:36:24 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:06:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > urgh, I screwed up, sorry. > > > > > > utrace-prep-2 reverts a bit of the underlying tree so that the utrace > > > patches (which are against mainline) don't throw a tremendous reject > > > which has to be fixed each time I pull Roland's tree. I'm supposed to > > > reapply that change after the utrace patches but forgot. > > > > btw., how about pushing utrace to v2.6.22, is anything big holding that > > up? (other than Roland's modesty, which we should gently but firmly > > ignore in this case =B-) > > a) lots of architecture support > b) lots of overengineered and obsfucated code > c) missing public information > > I've also not gotten any feedback to my ages old review and the issues > don't seem to be addressed either. > And rmk had showstopper problems with ARM support which I never saw resolved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
