Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this is a follow up for [1]. The first patch is what Tetsuo suggested > [2], I've just added a changelog for it. This one should be merged > as soon as possible. The second patch is still an RFC. I _believe_ > that it is the right thing to do but I haven't checked all the PF paths > which return VM_FAULT_OOM to be sure that there is nobody who would return > this error when not doing a real allocation. > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1495034780-9520-1-git-send-email-g...@fb.com > [2] > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201705182257.hjj52185.oqstflfmhvo...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp > >
Patch 1 is insufficient and patch 2 is wrong. Please wait. I'm writing patch 1 now.
