On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Oza Pawandeep <oza....@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> current device framework and OF framework integration assumes
>> dma-ranges in a way where memory-mapped devices define their
>> dma-ranges. (child-bus-address, parent-bus-address, length).
>>
>> of_dma_configure is specifically written to take care of memory
>> mapped devices. but no implementation exists for pci to take
>> care of pcie based memory ranges.
>
> Hi Oza,
>
> I'm trying to make sense of this, but am still rather puzzled. I have
> no idea what the distinction between memory-mapped devices and
> pcie based devices is in your description, as PCIe is usually memory
> mapped, and Linux doesn't actually support other kinds of PCIe
> devices on most architectures.
>
>> for e.g. iproc based SOCs and other SOCs(suc as rcar) have PCI
>> world dma-ranges.
>> dma-ranges = <0x43000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x80 0x00>;
>>
>> this patch serves following:
>>
>> 1) exposes interface to the pci host driver for their
>> inbound memory ranges
>>
>> 2) provide an interface to callers such as of_dma_get_ranges.
>> so then the returned size get best possible (largest) dma_mask.
>> because PCI RC drivers do not call APIs such as
>> dma_set_coherent_mask() and hence rather it shows its addressing
>> capabilities based on dma-ranges.
>>
>> for e.g.
>> dma-ranges = <0x43000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x80 0x00>;
>> we should get dev->coherent_dma_mask=0x7fffffffff.
>
> do you mean the coherent_dma_mask of the PCI host bridge
> or an attached device here?
>
> If you require PCI devices to come up with an initial
> coherent_dma_mask other than 0xffffffffff, there are other
> problems involved. In particular, you will need to use
> swiotlb, which is not supported on arm32 at the moment,
> and the dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask()
> functions need to be modified.
>
>> + while (1) {
>> + dma_ranges = of_get_property(node, "dma-ranges", &rlen);
>> +
>> + /* Ignore empty ranges, they imply no translation required.
>> */
>> + if (dma_ranges && rlen > 0)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* no dma-ranges, they imply no translation required. */
>> + if (!dma_ranges)
>> + break;
>
> A missing parent dma-ranges property here should really indicate that there
> is no valid translation. If we have existing cases where this happens
> in DT files, we may treat it as allowing only 32-bit DMA (as we already
> do for having no dma-ranges at all), but treating it the same way
> as an empty dma-ranges property sounds wrong.
>
> Arnd
Hi Arnd and Bjorn,
Can you please have a look at PATCH v7 ?
It addresses problem2 alone.
Regards,
Oza
