4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>

commit 754bd598be9bbc953bc709a9e8ed7f3188bfb9d7 upstream.

Hierarchy could be already throttled at this point. Throttled next
buddy could trigger a NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair().

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/146608183552.21905.15924473394414832071.stgit@buzz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Pineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4233,15 +4233,14 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq
 
                /* Don't dequeue parent if it has other entities besides us */
                if (cfs_rq->load.weight) {
+                       /* Avoid re-evaluating load for this entity: */
+                       se = parent_entity(se);
                        /*
                         * Bias pick_next to pick a task from this cfs_rq, as
                         * p is sleeping when it is within its sched_slice.
                         */
-                       if (task_sleep && parent_entity(se))
-                               set_next_buddy(parent_entity(se));
-
-                       /* avoid re-evaluating load for this entity */
-                       se = parent_entity(se);
+                       if (task_sleep && se && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+                               set_next_buddy(se);
                        break;
                }
                flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;


Reply via email to