On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:19:43 -0400, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG_TTYS > +#define PMACZILOG_MAJOR TTY_MAJOR > +#define PMACZILOG_MINOR 64 > +#define PMACZILOG_NAME "ttyS" > +#else > +#define PMACZILOG_MAJOR 204 > +#define PMACZILOG_MINOR 192 > +#define PMACZILOG_NAME "ttyPZ" > +#endif
Is major 204 minor 192 already allocated? Few weeks ago, I sent a patch to allocate 192...199 for other serial driver (Subject: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc3] serial: Allocate minor device numbers for serial_txx9 driver): http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/13/246 And it is already in -mm tree since 2.6.21-rc4-mm1. I just CC-ed the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I really do not know how "master" devices.txt updated finally. If I should take some further action to lanana.org or someone, please let me know. Thank you. --- Atsushi Nemoto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
