On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:29:16PM -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The memory copy from rodata to stack is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
I already applied this, reviewed-by would be nice for this one but given
how obvious this change is, it is not mandatory. I take my chances on
this one as a maitainer.
/Jarkko
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> index e3cf9f3545c5..3b1b9f9322d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int tpm_inf_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *dev,
> int vendorid[2];
> int version[2];
> int productid[2];
> - char chipname[20];
> + const char *chipname;
> struct tpm_chip *chip;
>
> /* read IO-ports through PnP */
> @@ -488,13 +488,13 @@ static int tpm_inf_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>
> switch ((productid[0] << 8) | productid[1]) {
> case 6:
> - snprintf(chipname, sizeof(chipname), " (SLD 9630 TT 1.1)");
> + chipname = " (SLD 9630 TT 1.1)";
> break;
> case 11:
> - snprintf(chipname, sizeof(chipname), " (SLB 9635 TT 1.2)");
> + chipname = " (SLB 9635 TT 1.2)";
> break;
> default:
> - snprintf(chipname, sizeof(chipname), " (unknown chip)");
> + chipname = " (unknown chip)";
> break;
> }
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>
