On Thu, 25 May 2017 14:17:12 +0300
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@microchip.com> wrote:

> Add node information for ADTRG hardware pin and the three possible
> edge nodes that are available for the driver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@microchip.com>

Given this is effectively an internal interrupt (i.e. one that software
never sees) I wonder if we can borrow some of the form of the binding
from there?

I'm not really sure it fits though so this is only a passing quick thought!

Jonathan
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt    | 17 
> +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt
> index 3223684..e30ede3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.txt
> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@ Required properties:
>    - atmel,min-sample-rate-hz: Minimum sampling rate, it depends on SoC.
>    - atmel,max-sample-rate-hz: Maximum sampling rate, it depends on SoC.
>    - atmel,startup-time-ms: Startup time expressed in ms, it depends on SoC.
> +  - atmel,trigger-edge-type: phandle to one of the adtrg possible edge types
> +
> +Required adtrg node:
> +  - Required edge nodes:
> +     For each possible edge type for the ADTRG hardware trigger pin,
> +      a specific sub node. The driver recognises only the three possible
> +      edge types: external_rising, external_falling, external_any.
>  
>  Example:
>  
> @@ -25,4 +32,14 @@ adc: adc@fc030000 {
>       atmel,startup-time-ms = <4>;
>       vddana-supply = <&vdd_3v3_lp_reg>;
>       vref-supply = <&vdd_3v3_lp_reg>;
> +     atmel,trigger-edge-type = <&external_rising>;
> +
> +     adtrg: adtrg {
> +             external_rising: external_rising {
> +             };
> +             external_falling: external_falling {
> +             };
> +             external_any: external_any {
> +             };
> +     };
>  }

Reply via email to