>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Turner, Ph D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Charles> It had been running Windows 2000 "Professional". Several Charles> months ago, he purchased Red Hat "DELUXE" version 6.2. He was Charles> unable to install it. I convinced him that installation was Charles> easy. Charles> I was terribly wrong. This Red Hat version is irrevocably Charles> defective. Great for you, since you know all these details one would have expected you to know what the linux-kernel list is meant for as well. Guess what, it's not a list for whining about distributions, it's something you can complain about to the distributors. Please come back once you have somethin on topic to discuss. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Defective Red Hat Dis... Richard Torkar
- Re: Was:Defective Red Hat... Richard.Reynolds
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distrib... Horst von Brand
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poo... Ben Ford
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution... Fort David
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly ... Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poo... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poo... Paul Fulghum
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Jes Sorensen
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Werner Almesberger
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly repr... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly ... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represent... Frank van Maarseveen