On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 07:47:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well, this does not answer my question: between latest tip:timers/nohz > > > and the > > > patches you posted there's a delta, so it's not just a pure rebase. > > > > Yeah but like I said, you can forget the series I posted because the diff is > > mostly cosmetic and things are actually ok as they are in tip:timers/nohz > > > > The only thing that bothers me is the fact that the HEAD of this branch > > doesn't have > > a changelog or even just a comment. > > We can still amend that - is this changelog what you had in mind: > > nohz: Reset next_tick cache even when the timer has no regs > > Handle tick interrupts whose regs are NULL, out of general paranoia. It > happens > when hrtimer_interrupt() is called from non-interrupt contexts, such as > hotplug > CPU down events. > > ?
Yep that one is fine. Thanks!
