On Friday 06 April 2007 12:16 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> and that the inner block code > >> (lines 3 and 4) should have more indent than line 2. > > > >We disagree. The "inner" block should in all cases have one-tab indent. > > You disagree. "We", as in, the kernel coders,
... agree with what I said, since that's exactly what CodingStyle says, and what essentially every line of kernel code does today. (There are random spots of brokenness, but they get fixed over time.) > though I do not speak for > them, seem to do it much the way I described, judging from the code they > wrote/write. Your eyes are broken then ... or maybe you're focussing exclusively on code that violates the most basic coding guidelines like: if (...) { THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB } and for (...) { THAT WAS ALSO ONE MORE TAB } Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense. - Indent always uses tabs - When breaking long lines (including long conditions) * STILL indent with tabs * ... and more than one, to be "substantially" more indented That's what Documentation/CodingStyle says **TODAY** so stop with the flamage. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/