On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > or lets just face it and name it what it is: process_struct ;-)
>
> That'd be fine too! Wonder if Linus would swallow a rename patch like
> that...
I don't really see the point. It's not even *true*. A "process" includes
more than the shared signal-handling - it would include files and fs etc
too.
So it's actually *more* correct to call it the shared signal state than it
would be to call it "process" state.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
