Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] net-next: dsa: add multi cpu port support

[Vivien Didelot]

Hi John,

John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> writes:

> +static inline bool dsa_is_upstream_port(struct dsa_switch *ds, int p)
> +{
> +     return dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, p) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, p);
> +}

This looks confusing to me. What DSA calls an "upstream" port for the
moment is the port which goes to the CPU interface.

     CPU0 (eth0)
       |
       | sw0         sw1         sw2
     [p0 p1 p2]--[p0 p1 p2]--[p0 p1 p2]
          |           |           |  |
          eth1     eth2        eth3  eth4

So in the example above, sw1p0 is an upstream port, but sw1p2 is not.
This is why dsa_upstream_port makes use of ds->rtable.

> @@ -1140,11 +1140,16 @@ int dsa_slave_create(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct 
> device *parent,
>       struct net_device *master;
>       struct net_device *slave_dev;
>       struct dsa_slave_priv *p;
> +     int port_cpu = ds->ports[port].upstream;

ds->ports[port] is p->dp.

>       int ret;
>  
> -     master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
> -     if (ds->master_netdev)
> +     if (port_cpu && ds->ports[port_cpu].ethernet)

0 is a valid port index for a CPU, e.g. Marvell 88E6390.

> +             master = ds->ports[port_cpu].ethernet;
> +     else if (ds->master_netdev)
>               master = ds->master_netdev;
> +     else
> +             master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
> +     master->dsa_ptr = (void *)ds->dst;
>  
>       slave_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct dsa_slave_priv), name,
>                                NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, ether_setup);
> @@ -1173,6 +1178,7 @@ int dsa_slave_create(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct 
> device *parent,
>       p->dp = &ds->ports[port];
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->mall_tc_list);
>       p->xmit = dst->tag_ops->xmit;
> +     p->master = master;

I'm a bit confused why we need all these references to net devices. We
now have ds->master_netdev, dst->master_netdev, dp->ethernet and
p->master...

Wouldn't it be simpler if we only had dp->ethernet (or whichever more
explicit name) for the conduit interface used to send/receive frames?

Maybe I am missing something, in which case I'm sorry in advance.


Thanks,

        Vivien