On 05/31/17 05:48, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Pretty drastic.  Hit ^S to pause scrolling, and instantly hung terminal.
Seen on both urxvt and xterm under x11, and on virtual console screens.

This appears in dmesg:

  [ 1844.182058] INFO: task kworker/u8:3:129 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [ 1844.182073]       Tainted: G           OE   4.12.0-rc3-next-20170530 #489
  [ 1844.182078] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables 
this message.
  [ 1844.182085] kworker/u8:3    D11008   129      2 0x00000000
  [ 1844.182109] Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
  [ 1844.182118] Call Trace:
  [ 1844.182136]  __schedule+0x43e/0x1020
  [ 1844.182147]  ? schedule_preempt_disabled+0x27/0xd0
  [ 1844.182156]  schedule+0x5d/0x1d0
  [ 1844.182164]  ? __mutex_lock+0x4c9/0x11c0
  [ 1844.182172]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0x27/0xd0
  [ 1844.182179]  __mutex_lock+0x4c9/0x11c0
  [ 1844.182191]  ? tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x58/0xc0
  [ 1844.182204]  ? ldsem_down_read_trylock+0xc3/0x130
  [ 1844.182215]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
  [ 1844.182222]  ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
  [ 1844.182230]  tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x58/0xc0
  [ 1844.182240]  flush_to_ldisc+0xea/0x220
  [ 1844.182249]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x290
  [ 1844.182262]  process_one_work+0x3d6/0xd00
  [ 1844.182269]  ? lock_acquire+0xae/0x2f0
  [ 1844.182284]  worker_thread+0x71/0x830
  [ 1844.182297]  kthread+0x1a9/0x270
  [ 1844.182304]  ? process_one_work+0xd00/0xd00
  [ 1844.182310]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
  [ 1844.182321]  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
  [ 1844.182608] INFO: lockdep is turned off.

Bisects down to this commit, and things work when it's reverted.

Commit 925bb1ce47f4.
Author: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nos...@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu May 11 12:18:52 2017 +0200

     tty: fix port buffer locking

     tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() is racy against itself when called
     from the ioctl(TCXONC, TCION/TCIOFF) path [1] and the flush_to_ldisc()
     workqueue path [2].

Gah, if it's that easy to trigger a deadlock (as opposed to just a
lockdep warning), we should revert the patch until I have a better fix.

^S doesn't seem to reproduce it here, though. Too bad your stack trace
doesn't show the process already holding the lock.


Vegard

Reply via email to