On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jean Delvare <[email protected]> wrote:
> Before accessing DMI data to record it for later, we should ensure
> that the DMI structures are large enough to contain the data in
> question.

> -       const u8 *d = (u8 *) dm + index;
> +       const u8 *d;

> +       d = (u8 *) dm + index;

I think you may leave this as is and make it compiler's burden to optimize.

> -       const u8 *d = (u8 *) dm + index;
> +       const u8 *d;

> +       d = (u8 *) dm + index;

Ditto.

> -       int i, count = *(u8 *)(dm + 1);
> +       int i, count;

> +       count = *(u8 *)(dm + 1);

Ditto.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to