Am 01.06.2017 um 22:40 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >>> Sure, but that seems orthogonal? In the absence of an answer from Eli, >>> either you could take my patch or just send reverts of Eli's two >>> commits, whichever you prefer. >> >> Or you and Thomas could investigate. :-) > > Honestly, I don't know what do you want me to investigate, my host > machine is old (2.6.32) and does not support PTRACE_GETREGSET or > friends, nor does it have _xstate, so with that, we either don't use > those period, which would be a revert, or we just conditionally build > support for that (my patch) and everyone is happy.
This is exactly why we have this mess right now. Everybody is just focusing on his own stuff. > I don't know what the issue Thomas is having (he is now CC'd) and I > still don't understand why you insist on conflating the symbol clash > while statically linking with support for newer x86 FPU stuff... The said commits introduced issues, you face some, Thomas is facing some. I want them to get fixed or at least understood before we apply new patches. Thanks, //richard
