On 06/01/2017 01:26 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
+/* min/typical/max system clock (xclk) frequencies */
+#define OV5640_XCLK_MIN 6000000
+#define OV5640_XCLK_MAX 24000000
+
+/*
+ * FIXME: there is no subdev API to set the MIPI CSI-2
+ * virtual channel yet, so this is hardcoded for now.
+ */
+#define OV5640_MIPI_VC 1
Can the FIXME be fixed?
Yes, but it's quite a bit of work. It makes sense to use a static virtual
channel for now. A patchset which is however incomplete can be found here:
<URL:https://git.linuxtv.org/sailus/media_tree.git/log/?h=vc>
For what it's worth, all other devices use virtual channel zero for image
data and so should this one.
Actually no. The CSI2IPU gasket in i.MX6 quad sends virtual channel 0
streams to IPU1-CSI0. But input to IPU1-CSI0 is also muxed with parallel
bus cameras. So if vc0 were chosen instead, platforms that support
parallel cameras to IPU1-CSI0 (SabreLite, SabreSD) would not be able
to use them concurrently with a MIPI CSI-2 source to IPU1-CSI1. So I
prefer to use static channel 1 to support those platforms.
I could convert this to a module parameter however, until a virtual
channel selection subdev API becomes available, at which point that
would have to be stripped.
+/*
+ * image size under 1280 * 960 are SUBSAMPLING
-> Image
+ * image size upper 1280 * 960 are SCALING
above?
done.
+/*
+ * FIXME: all of these register tables are likely filled with
+ * entries that set the register to their power-on default values,
+ * and which are otherwise not touched by this driver. Those entries
+ * should be identified and removed to speed register load time
+ * over i2c.
+ */
load->loading? Can the FIXME be fixed?
That's a lot of work, and risky work at that. If someone could take
this on (strip out power-on default values from the tables), I'd
be grateful, but I don't have the time. For now at least, these
registers sets work fine.
+ /* Auto/manual exposure */
+ ctrls->auto_exp = v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu(hdl, ops,
+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO,
+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_MANUAL, 0,
+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_AUTO);
+ ctrls->exposure = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE,
+ 0, 65535, 1, 0);
Is exposure_absolute supposed to be in microseconds...?
Yes.
According to the docs V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE is in 100 usec units.
OTOH V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE has no defined unit, so it's a better fit IMO.
Way more drivers appear to be using EXPOSURE than EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, too.
Done, switched to V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE. It's true, this control is not
taking 100 usec units, so unit-less is better.
Steve
