With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new instead of probe.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <[email protected]> --- Compile tested. drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c index d7ec318..200a9c8 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65090.c @@ -174,8 +174,7 @@ static bool is_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps65090_of_match); #endif -static int tps65090_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, - const struct i2c_device_id *id) +static int tps65090_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client) { struct tps65090_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev); int irq_base = 0; @@ -249,20 +248,13 @@ static int tps65090_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) return 0; } -static const struct i2c_device_id tps65090_id_table[] = { - { "tps65090", 0 }, - { }, -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps65090_id_table); - static struct i2c_driver tps65090_driver = { .driver = { .name = "tps65090", .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tps65090_of_match), }, - .probe = tps65090_i2c_probe, + .probe_new = tps65090_i2c_probe, .remove = tps65090_i2c_remove, - .id_table = tps65090_id_table, }; static int __init tps65090_init(void) -- 1.9.1
