* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
>
> efi_call_phys_prolog() used to return a "pgd_t *" that meant one of
> three different things depending on kernel and system configuration.
> Clean it up so it uses a union and is more explicit about what's
> going on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 6 +++---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_32.c | 12 ++++++------
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Hm, this patch does not apply cleanly to v4.12-rc4:
Applying patch patches/x86efi_Clean_up_efi_CR3_saverestore-1.patch
patching file arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
patching file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
patching file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_32.c
patching file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 69.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 86.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 152 with fuzz 1 (offset 44 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 116.
3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
what tree is this against?
Thanks,
Ingo
