Mr Masahiro, On 06/06/2017 09:47 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Cao, > > > 2017-05-29 12:21 GMT+09:00 Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>: >> The help info of `make -C=1` is little confusing, make it clear. > > `make C=1` instead of `make -C=1` > > > >> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> Makefile | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >> index efa267a..b34a34d 100644 >> --- a/Makefile >> +++ b/Makefile >> @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ help: >> @echo ' make V=0|1 [targets] 0 => quiet build (default), 1 => >> verbose build' >> @echo ' make V=2 [targets] 2 => give reason for rebuild of >> target' >> @echo ' make O=dir [targets] Locate all output files in "dir", >> including .config' >> - @echo ' make C=1 [targets] Check all c source with $$CHECK >> (sparse by default)' >> + @echo ' make C=1 [targets] Check re-compiled c source only with >> $$CHECK (sparse by default)' >> @echo ' make C=2 [targets] Force check of all c source with >> $$CHECK' >> @echo ' make RECORDMCOUNT_WARN=1 [targets] Warn about ignored >> mcount sections' >> @echo ' make W=n [targets] Enable extra gcc checks, n=1,2,3 >> where' > > Which phrase is qualified by "only"? > > [1] re-compiled c source only > [2] only with $$CHECK > > I know [1] is what you mean (sorry for my nitpicking). >
You are right, after reading it again, I myself have the same feeling as you... > > Perhaps, "Check only re-compiled c source with $$CHECK" is even clearer? > > (or, just drop "only" because "re-compiled c source" is understandable enough > ?) I prefer the latter one. > > > Could you use "kbuild: " instead of "Top Makefile" in the subject? > Sure. Thanks very much for your suggestion:) -- Sincerely, Cao jin
