On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Follow the pattern, please, I suppose > ti_pmic_tps68470.c
This pattern is weird. "ti" in front of the file name is redundant, and in very few places the vendor prefix is used anyway. Especially when the chip has a proper name --- as this one does. I assume for the Intel PMICs it could be there for a couple of reasons which are 1) lack of a clearly unique chip ID and 2) the use of common frameworklet for Intel PMICs. There are also no other PMIC chips supported currently. The pmic_tps68470 naming is in line with the GPIO driver (apart from the dash / underscore difference). -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
