From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>

If "i" is the last element in the vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[] array, it 
potentially can be exploited the vulnerability. this will out-of-bounds 
read and write the unused memory in host OS.

This patch fixes it by modding the index to avoid the out-of-bounds. At 
the worst case, i == j and ej->function == e->function, the loop can bail
out.

Reported-by: Moguofang <moguof...@huawei.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
Cc: Moguofang <moguof...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index a181ae7..b927a42 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -779,19 +779,20 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
 
 static int move_to_next_stateful_cpuid_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int i)
 {
+       int j = i, nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
        struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *e = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[i];
-       int j, nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
+       struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej;
 
        e->flags &= ~KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
        /* when no next entry is found, the current entry[i] is reselected */
-       for (j = i + 1; ; j = (j + 1) % nent) {
-               struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j];
-               if (ej->function == e->function) {
-                       ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
-                       return j;
-               }
-       }
-       return 0; /* silence gcc, even though control never reaches here */
+       do {
+               j = (j + 1) % nent;
+               ej = &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries[j];
+       } while(ej->function != e->function);
+
+       ej->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_STATE_READ_NEXT;
+
+       return j;
 }
 
 /* find an entry with matching function, matching index (if needed), and that
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to