On Monday 09 April 2007 20:25:20 Christoph Lameter wrote: > #endif /* _X86_64_PGALLOC_H */ > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2007-04-07 > 18:07:47.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2007-04-07 > 18:09:30.000000000 -0700 > @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ > if (__get_cpu_var(cpu_idle_state)) > __get_cpu_var(cpu_idle_state) = 0; > > + check_pgt_cache();
Wouldn't it be better to do that on memory pressure only (register it as a shrinker)? > rmb(); > idle = pm_idle; > if (!idle) > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c 2007-04-07 > 18:07:47.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c 2007-04-07 > 18:09:30.000000000 -0700 > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ > } > if (!cpus_empty(cpu_mask)) > flush_tlb_others(cpu_mask, mm, FLUSH_ALL); > - > + check_pgt_cache(); Why is that here? > preempt_enable(); > } -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
