Thanks Chris! On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:58:31PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > erasesize is meaningful for flash devices but for SRAM there is no > concept of an erase block so erasesize is set to 0. When partitioning > these devices instead of ensuring partitions fall on erasesize > boundaries we ensure they fall on writesize boundaries. > > Helped-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Looks good to me. Did Boris have any last thoughts? Or else I'll merge this.
